Re: Lisp as procedural language

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Lisp as procedural language
Date: 2001-05-08 19:23:03
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0105082121500.759-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian writes:

> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > Can someone explain why we have a lisp.sgml file in our docs? Seems it
> > > descripes a 3rd party Emacs interface. I don't think we should start
> > > distributing docs for software we don't distribute. Can I remove it?
> >
> > Only if you move the pointer to someplace more appropriate (don't we
> > have somewhere on the website with links to outside software?)
>
> We sure do:
>
> http://postgresql.readysetnet.com/interfaces.html

Might as well move pgadmin.sgml there too.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-08 19:29:22 Re: Lisp as procedural language
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-08 19:22:32 Re: NOCREATETABLE patch (was: Re: Please, help!(about Postgres))