Re: Lisp as procedural language

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Vladimir V(dot) Zolotych" <gsmith(at)eurocom(dot)od(dot)ua>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Lisp as procedural language
Date: 2001-05-07 22:06:55
Message-ID: 200105072206.f47M6tv04008@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Can someone explain why we have a lisp.sgml file in our docs? Seems it
> > descripes a 3rd party Emacs interface. I don't think we should start
> > distributing docs for software we don't distribute. Can I remove it?
>
> Only if you move the pointer to someplace more appropriate (don't we
> have somewhere on the website with links to outside software?)

We sure do:

http://postgresql.readysetnet.com/interfaces.html

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= 2001-05-07 22:07:16 Re: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems
Previous Message mlw 2001-05-07 21:41:28 Re: File system performance and pg_xlog (More info)