Re: Re: pg_upgrade

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: pg_upgrade
Date: 2001-03-22 16:51:32
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0103221751110.1208-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> > If it doesn't work, and will not be made to work, then let's remove it
> > from the tree.
>
> I tend to agree with Peter's slightly less drastic proposal: remove it
> >from the installed fileset and disable its man page, without necessarily
> 'cvs remove'ing all the source files. (I see we have already removed
> all the other documentation references to it, so disconnecting the ref
> page from reference.sgml should be sufficient.)

I'll do this then.

>
> I hope that pg_upgrade will be of use again in the future, so even
> though it can't work for 7.1, a scorched-earth policy is not the way
> to go...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2001-03-22 16:56:42 Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-03-22 16:43:00 Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.