RE: Unique or Primary Key?

From: Joel Burton <jburton(at)scw(dot)org>
To: Christian Marschalek <cm(at)chello(dot)at>
Cc: "'Bruce Richardson'" <pgsql(at)itsbruce(dot)uklinux(dot)net>, "[GENERAL] PostgreSQL" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Unique or Primary Key?
Date: 2001-05-03 20:49:46
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0105031648200.8245-100000@olympus.scw.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> > Besides, I couldn't see much use in creating it as a primary
> > key. How
> > would I ever reference it from another table?

If you're questioning how to use a multi-field primary key, it's easy...

create table p (id1 int not null, id2 int not null, primary key(id1,
id2));

create table c (id1 int, id2 int, foreign key (id1, id2) references p);

insert into p values (1,2);
insert into c values (1,1);
insert into c values (1,0);

ERROR: <unnamed> referential integrity violation - key referenced from c
not found in p

--
Joel Burton <jburton(at)scw(dot)org>
Director of Information Systems, Support Center of Washington

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message GH 2001-05-03 21:03:18 Re: Ideal hardware configuration for pgsql/Netra
Previous Message Michelle Murrain 2001-05-03 20:49:15 Re: DBD::Pg errstr method doesn't return full error messages