Re: Ideal hardware configuration for pgsql/Netra

From: GH <grasshacker(at)over-yonder(dot)net>
To: "Albertson, Chris" <CAlbertson(at)primeadvantage(dot)com>
Cc: "'Hunter Hillegas'" <lists(at)lastonepicked(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ideal hardware configuration for pgsql/Netra
Date: 2001-05-03 21:03:18
Message-ID: 20010503160318.F27648@over-yonder.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 12:52:24PM -0700, some SMTP stream spewed forth:
>
> It's sitting right here on my desk. Ask whatever you want.
>
> Yes they are better web servers than DBMS servers but if you
> database is small enough to cache in RAM then who care if
> the Netra uses slow disks?
>
> All that talk on this list about Linux vs. BSD is silly.
> Why bother when you can have Solaris 8 on SPARC hardware?

Does anybody ever actually *READ* the $%(at)#-ing threads?
I never said a word about Linux. RedHat does *NOT* equal LINUX!

Somebody claimed that my post was uninformed...yet RedHat is all of Linux
now?

If you are going to refute a statement, please at least have the decency
to READ it.

Can we end this?

gh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-03 21:04:02 Re: mysql to Pgsql
Previous Message Joel Burton 2001-05-03 20:49:46 RE: Unique or Primary Key?