| From: | Todd Graham Lewis <tlewis(at)mindspring(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Developers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, dz(at)cs(dot)unitn(dot)it |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] XIDTAG ??? |
| Date: | 1999-05-04 02:32:49 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.04.9905032231190.24782-100000@reflections.eng.mindspring.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 3 May 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Probably no reason for the transaction id. I don't remember that being
> used at all.
Do you mean that there is no reason for the xid to exist, as it is not
used? If so, then may I humbly request that it be left in for another
six months in the hopes of using a transaction processing monitor to
distribute postgres across multiple machines safely? I'll need the xid
if and when I start that project, which will be after I finish the
TPM. 8^)
--
Todd Graham Lewis Postmaster, MindSpring Enterprises
tlewis(at)mindspring(dot)net (800) 719-4664, x22804
"A pint of sweat will save a gallon of blood." -- George S. Patton
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-05-04 04:38:49 | Re: [HACKERS] an older problem? hash table out of memory |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-05-04 02:06:04 | Re: [HACKERS] adate::Date is equiv. to adate if adate is type of Date ? |