| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Todd Graham Lewis <tlewis(at)mindspring(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Developers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, dz(at)cs(dot)unitn(dot)it |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] XIDTAG ??? |
| Date: | 1999-05-04 04:41:30 |
| Message-ID: | 199905040441.AAA15619@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Mon, 3 May 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Probably no reason for the transaction id. I don't remember that being
> > used at all.
>
> Do you mean that there is no reason for the xid to exist, as it is not
> used? If so, then may I humbly request that it be left in for another
> six months in the hopes of using a transaction processing monitor to
> distribute postgres across multiple machines safely? I'll need the xid
> if and when I start that project, which will be after I finish the
> TPM. 8^)
No, I don't recommend removing it, but just not storing it in the lock
system. There is no need for it there.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 1999-05-04 05:05:33 | Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-05-04 04:38:49 | Re: [HACKERS] an older problem? hash table out of memory |