Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"

From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"
Date: 2008-12-01 22:20:36
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.64.0812011714380.9082@westnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I wonder if I'm the only one who just saved a copy of that post for
reference in case it gets forcibly removed...

Recently I was thinking about whether I had enough material to warrant a
2008 update to "Why PostgreSQL instead of MySQL"; who would have guessed
that Monty would do most of the research I was considering for me?

--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Raymond O'Donnell 2008-12-01 22:33:14 Re: [pgsql-www] Reg: Nested query
Previous Message justin 2008-12-01 22:11:10 Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"