| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Mark Hollomon <mhh(at)nortelnetworks(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: New relkind for views |
| Date: | 2000-10-16 23:41:43 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0010162040510.342-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > "Hollomon, Mark" wrote:
> > >
> > > Do we still want to be able to inherit from views?
> >
> > Also:
> >
> > Currently a view may be dropped with either 'DROP VIEW'
> > or 'DROP TABLE'. Should this be changed?
>
> I say let them drop it with either one.
I kinda like the 'drop index with drop index', 'drop table with drop
table' and 'drop view with drop view' groupings ... at least you are
pretty sure you haven't 'oopsed' in the process :)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-16 23:52:54 | Re: Re: New relkind for views] |
| Previous Message | Per Hedeland | 2000-10-16 23:29:40 | Re: getting local domain to get attached through sendmail ... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-16 23:52:54 | Re: Re: New relkind for views] |
| Previous Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2000-10-16 21:02:42 | Re: [PATCHES] Re: when does CREATE VIEW not create a view? |