Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Date: 2000-05-05 05:40:01
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0005050239350.56194-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 5 May 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:

> > Hiroshi did commit a change to doc/src/sgml/ref/postgres-ref.sgml for
> > that just a few days ago, but I guess it didn't make it into the derived
> > files that Thomas was preparing off-line. I believe there were several
> > other small doco fixes while Thomas was on vacation --- I dunno if he
> > plans to try to get those into the 7.0 derived docs or not.
>
> I'll move a new copy of the html into users-lounge before release, and
> will try poking at the hardcopy versions too (but I consider the
> hardcopy fixes noncritical since we are so far past the "freeze"
> point).
>
> Depends on the actual release schedule as to whether they will get in
> to the hardcopy; the pg_group stuff doesn't open a large can of worms,
> but we might want a few days for it to settle out??

I have no probs with extending the release a couple of days ... Wednesday
sound good for everyone, as things stand now?

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-05 05:40:35 Re: 7.0RC2 compile error !
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-05-05 05:37:48 Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?