Re: [HACKERS] Another source of snprintf/vsnprintf code

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Todd Graham Lewis <tlewis(at)mindspring(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another source of snprintf/vsnprintf code
Date: 1999-01-25 18:27:32
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9901251426260.1636-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Tom Lane wrote:

> Todd Graham Lewis <tlewis(at)mindspring(dot)net> writes:
> > I assume LGPL is license non grata?
>
> Probably. I'm not sure what Marc's position is, but I'd say we ought
> to try to keep everything under a single set of license rules --- and
> for better or worse, BSD license is what we have for the existing code.

Exactly...

If there are any problems with our current implementation, let us know so
that we can correct it...I haven't heard of any recently though (either
haven't heard, or its fallen on deaf ears?)

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 1999-01-25 18:33:07 Re: [HACKERS] FW: [CORE] create database bug
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-01-25 18:04:12 Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin