| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Robinson <robinson(at)public(dot)bta(dot)net(dot)cn> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA |
| Date: | 1998-11-13 17:39:17 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.05.9811131331180.9308-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
On Sat, 14 Nov 1998, Michael Robinson wrote:
< a very well written description removed >
> Which ORB?
>
> GNOME started with Mico. Mico, apparently, makes use of C++ templates,
> which caused the compiler they were using to generate bloated, wallowing
> code.
Is that still accurate today?
> GNOME then adopted ORBit, which has two wins: it's in C, and (this is
> the biggy) it has provisions to shortcut parameter marshalling,
So...implement an OO 'environment' with a non-OO language? :)
My experience is that for pretty much every pro, there is a
con...what are we losing with ORBit that we'd have with mico? Short
and/or long term? mico is reputed to be Corba 2.2 compliant..orbit?
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jackson, DeJuan | 1998-11-13 18:38:28 | RE: [HACKERS] shmem limits and redolog |
| Previous Message | Michael Robinson | 1998-11-13 17:19:49 | More PostgreSQL+CORBA |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 1998-11-13 22:52:39 | Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA |
| Previous Message | Michael Robinson | 1998-11-13 17:19:49 | More PostgreSQL+CORBA |