RE: [HACKERS] shmem limits and redolog

From: "Jackson, DeJuan" <djackson(at)cpsgroup(dot)com>
To: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] shmem limits and redolog
Date: 1998-11-13 18:38:28
Message-ID: F10BB1FAF801D111829B0060971D839F4FEB5F@cpsmail
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> What do the others say?
>
In my opinion a redo log is more than worth the overhead. If it is
possible to keep those databases that aren't using the log from creating
the shmem and semaphores until logging is turned on for them, I'd say
you'd eliminated all of the possible arguments.
-DEJ

> Jan
>
>

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 1998-11-13 18:46:20 shmem limits and redolog
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-11-13 17:39:17 Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA