From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] New INET and CIDR types |
Date: | 1998-10-21 18:43:21 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.05.9810211442460.7470-100000@hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 21 Oct 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have recieved the files from D'Arcy for new INET and CIDR types. INET
> is use for hosts, while CIDR for networks. No duplicate code. CIDR
> behaves the same as INET, except for a different input function. The
> system catalogs take care of the mapping of CIDR to INET functions.
>
> It will require an initdb for beta users moving to 6.4 final. Is this
> OK? If so, I will apply it tomorrow. If not, the type will have to be
> disabled for 6.4.
>
> The big question is how many people have _live_ data in 6.4 beta
> databases, who don't want to initdb for 6.4 final, and can't use
> pg_upgrade to move to 6.4 final.
>
> If I don't hear any objections, I will do it some time around noon
> tomorrow, EST.
Great...I'm going to plan for a BETA3 to be put out for Friday, so that
the testing broadens out a bit more...
Marc G. Fournier scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
scrappy(at){postgresql|isc}.org ICQ#7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 1998-10-21 18:49:41 | Re: Protections problem on CVS tree |
Previous Message | Paul A Vixie | 1998-10-21 17:21:18 | Re: [HACKERS] New INET and CIDR types |