Re: [HACKERS] New INET and CIDR types

From: Paul A Vixie <paul(at)vix(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain), hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New INET and CIDR types
Date: 1998-10-21 17:21:18
Message-ID: 199810211721.KAA01043@bb.rc.vix.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I would think the CIDR type should preserve the /32.

Makes no difference. If all four octets are specified and no "/" is given,
the "/32" is assumed. Printing it would be nicer but not printing it is not
an error.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 1998-10-21 18:43:21 Re: [HACKERS] New INET and CIDR types
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-21 17:12:43 Re: [HACKERS] New INET and CIDR types