Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/bin/initdb initdb.sh'

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/bin/initdb initdb.sh'
Date: 1998-02-24 04:38:43
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.3.96.980224003627.230N-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> >
> > On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Can I suggest pgview_ then? Another problem is that a \d on an empty
> > > database, \d is going to show this view, isn't it. Kind of strange to
> > > me.
> >
> > I modified psql already such that:
> >
> > relname !~ '^[pd][bg]_'
> >
> > is ignored :)
>
> I still disagree. Why not keep the system stuff pg_? This can be done,
> and it keeps things consistent. The above check also finds pb_ and dg_.

Actually, I'm not married to db_* for views...it was a "quick fix"
to ensure that things still worked. Whatever we decide on, both Julie and
Peter, at a minimum, need to know relatively soon. I know in Julie's
case, she does do a call to pg_user...I let her know tonight that she
needs to change it to db_user, for the *current* code...

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brett McCormick 1998-02-24 04:59:10 Re: [HACKERS] Views on aggregates - need assistence
Previous Message Vadim B. Mikheev 1998-02-24 04:26:09 Re: [HACKERS] regression: select_views.sql