Re: Server Performance

From: Chris(dot)Ellis(at)shropshire(dot)gov(dot)uk
To: scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Server Performance
Date: 2009-03-31 14:54:40
Message-ID: OF1067BF8A.18710B76-ON8025758A.0051C5F8-8025758A.005211F4@shropshire.gov.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote on 31/03/2009 15:53:34:

> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:21 AM, <Chris(dot)Ellis(at)shropshire(dot)gov(dot)uk> wrote:
> >
> > Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote on 31/03/2009 15:16:01:
> >
> >> I'd call IBM and ask them to come pick up their boat anchors.
> >
> > My sentiments exactly, unfortunately, I seem stuck with them :(
>
> Can you at least source your own RAID controllers?

Yes I will be, I never really did trust IBM and I certainly don't now!

I just need to choose the correct RAID card now, good performance at the
right price.

Chris Ellis

******************************************************************************
If you are not the intended recipient of this email please do not send it on
to others, open any attachments or file the email locally.
Please inform the sender of the error and then delete the original email.
For more information, please refer to http://www.shropshire.gov.uk/privacy.nsf
******************************************************************************

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-03-31 14:57:35 Re: [GENERAL] pgstattuple triggered checkpoint failure and database outage?
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2009-03-31 14:53:34 Re: Server Performance