Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch
Date: 2005-08-01 08:46:26
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4AC9647@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 01 August 2005 03:26
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: PostgreSQL-patches
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> >
> > [Resent as the list seems to have rejected yesterdays attempt]
> >
> > As per Bruce's request, here's a copy of Andreas' server
> > instrumentation patch for review. I've separated out the
> > dbsize stuff and pg_terminate_backend is also not included.
> >
> > This version was generated against CVS today.
> >
> > As far as I can tell from review of comments made back to
> > pre-8.0, all security and other concerns raised have been addressed.
>
> Here is a modified version of your patch that adds functions to do
> configuration file reload, and log file rotation.

OK, thanks. Are there any objections to adding pg_dir_ls() and
pg_file_read() which will allow us to look at the log directory, and the
logfiles themselves?

Regards, Dave

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-08-01 08:53:51 Re: per user/database connections limit again
Previous Message Michael Paesold 2005-08-01 07:55:11 Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum loose ends