| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, jd <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgFoundry Download URLs |
| Date: | 2009-12-30 07:17:06 |
| Message-ID: | E6E9B66B-4865-482F-9F0F-FCF31607779A@justatheory.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Dec 29, 2009, at 8:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Which is not to say that it wouldn't be nice if pgfoundry were
> better-than-average on this point. But it's not worse than average;
> it's right in line with the generally abysmal state of persistent URIs.
What an endorsement.
Please, can it at least suck less?
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-12-30 12:38:05 | Re: pgFoundry Download URLs |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-12-30 05:51:51 | Re: pgFoundry Download URLs |