RE: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem

From: "Henshall, Stuart - WCP" <SHenshall(at)westcountrypublications(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem
Date: 2001-05-21 12:00:59
Message-ID: E2870D8CE1CCD311BAF50008C71EDE8E01F745BF@MAIL_EXCHANGE
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Apologises if I've missed something, but isn't that the same xmin that ODBC
uses for row versioning?
- Stuart

<Snip>
> Currently, the XMIN/XMAX command counters are used only by the current
> transaction, and they are useless once the transaction finishes and take
> up 8 bytes on disk.
<Snip>

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zak McGregor 2001-05-21 14:04:25 Re: Queries across multiple databases (was: SELECT from a table in another database).
Previous Message Andrew Rawnsley 2001-05-21 11:55:13 Queries across multiple databases =?iso-8859-1?q?=A0?=(was: SELECT from a table in another database).