Re: RE: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RE: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem
Date: 2001-05-21 14:53:13
Message-ID: 3B092BD9.258E8E43@tm.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Henshall, Stuart - WCP" wrote:
>
> Apologises if I've missed something, but isn't that the same xmin that ODBC
> uses for row versioning?
> - Stuart
>
> <Snip>
> > Currently, the XMIN/XMAX command counters are used only by the current
> > transaction, and they are useless once the transaction finishes and take
> > up 8 bytes on disk.
> <Snip>

BTW, is there some place where I could read about exact semantics of
sytem fields ?

--------------------
Hannu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2001-05-21 15:04:37 AW: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2001-05-21 14:44:42 AW: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem