Re[2]: Build PG 8.4 (MinGW vs. MSVC)

From: el dorado <do_ra_do(at)mail(dot)ru>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re[2]: Build PG 8.4 (MinGW vs. MSVC)
Date: 2009-09-21 07:57:36
Message-ID: E1MpdmC-0007iH-00.do_ra_do-mail-ru@f229.mail.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> > What is recommended now for building PG 8.4 for WinXP? Is it better to use MSVC compiler?>

> MingW is perfectly supported, and we know people use it.
> MSVC is the recommended one I'd say, mainly because that's how the
> official binaries are built, so the results are much more well-tested.
> It also produces builds that are compatible with standard platform
> debugger and profiling tools.
> Magnus Hagander

Thank you very much for your answer.
According to your recommendation I try to use MSVC as described here http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/install-win32-full.html.
I configure options in config.pl and run build. I don't build from CVS and I know from documentation that "Bison and Flex are required to build from CVS, but not required when building from a release file". But I get the error:

Done building project "pgsql.sln" -- FAILED
Build FAILED.
Project : error PRJ0019: A tool returned an error from "Running bison on src\interfaces\ecpg\preproc\preproc.y"
0 Warning(s)
1 Error(s)
Time Elapsed 00:00:56:12

Maybe I should set some other options in configuration files? I didn't find any information about it in documentation... :(

Regards, Marina.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christian Koetschan 2009-09-21 12:04:06 Storage of Foreign Keys
Previous Message abhishekgautam009 2009-09-21 02:19:48 Re: Substitutes for some Oracle packages