Re: Another Modest Proposal: Platforms

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Another Modest Proposal: Platforms
Date: 2010-09-22 22:01:42
Message-ID: E021C5D5-C61D-4D83-AFCB-7646D85F4CD5@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sep 22, 2010, at 2:08 PM, David Fetter wrote:

> It's not about naming platforms for exclusion. It's about requiring
> functionalities for *in*clusion.

Passes all tests.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-09-22 22:03:16 Re: Another Modest Proposal: Platforms
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-09-22 22:01:39 Re: Why is time with timezone 12 bytes?