On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> In any case, the issue looks bigger than just addRangeTableEntry
> itself. Do you want to write up a patch?
>
I was going to include it in the overflow patch but I'm now thinking I
should make it a separate commit to make sure the change in the contract
isn't buried in overflow check changes that are supposed to not change
functionality. I'll do that.
--
greg