Re: somewhat wrong archive_command example

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: somewhat wrong archive_command example
Date: 2011-09-21 01:58:31
Message-ID: CAHGQGwHnVtdeaTKSx+JwC3JKsgkNUH0cyJi4QXBV+3tRw4Tdjg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 15:17, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> At
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/continuous-archiving.html
>> we say
>>
>> """
>> Many people choose to use scripts to define their archive_command, so
>> that their postgresql.conf entry looks very simple:
>>
>> archive_command = 'local_backup_script.sh'
>> """
>>
>> It seems to me, however, that even a simple archive_command like that
>> ought to contain at least %p, right?
>
> Should always need both %p and %f, no?

Yes unless the script extracts the file name from the path given as %p.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2011-09-21 02:45:09 Re: somewhat wrong archive_command example
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2011-09-20 13:34:06 Re: somewhat wrong archive_command example