Re: somewhat wrong archive_command example

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: somewhat wrong archive_command example
Date: 2011-09-20 13:34:06
Message-ID: CABUevEzSt1aB0zONL2g0TTa0W3q9uAwHFRCbxXyySXcv6sJZJQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 15:17, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> At
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/continuous-archiving.html
> we say
>
> """
> Many people choose to use scripts to define their archive_command, so
> that their postgresql.conf entry looks very simple:
>
> archive_command = 'local_backup_script.sh'
> """
>
> It seems to me, however, that even a simple archive_command like that
> ought to contain at least %p, right?

Should always need both %p and %f, no?

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2011-09-21 01:58:31 Re: somewhat wrong archive_command example
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-09-20 13:17:51 somewhat wrong archive_command example