Re: IDLE in transaction introspection

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Scott Mead <scottm(at)openscg(dot)com>
Cc: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, "Andrew Dunstan *EXTERN*" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: IDLE in transaction introspection
Date: 2011-11-04 02:27:51
Message-ID: CAHGQGwFmYz-Y21hGAjVijOaE-dqTBz5AkC_EJuWkMeoj_wre+g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Scott Mead <scottm(at)openscg(dot)com> wrote:
> ISTM that we're all for:
>    creating a new column: state
>    renaming current_query => query
>    State will display <RUNNING>, <IDLE>, <IDLE> in transaction, etc...
>    query will display the last query that was executed.

The greater/less-than-sign is still required in the State display?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2011-11-04 02:36:48 Re: DeArchiver process
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2011-11-04 00:27:37 Re: heap_page_prune comments