| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Scott Mead <scottm(at)openscg(dot)com>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, "Andrew Dunstan *EXTERN*" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: IDLE in transaction introspection |
| Date: | 2011-11-04 07:15:28 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEyCJJXdUs-Q2rDVxkC+0pn3xkh4WicgPz+zkF__sbax+g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 03:27, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Scott Mead <scottm(at)openscg(dot)com> wrote:
>> ISTM that we're all for:
>> creating a new column: state
>> renaming current_query => query
>> State will display <RUNNING>, <IDLE>, <IDLE> in transaction, etc...
>> query will display the last query that was executed.
>
> The greater/less-than-sign is still required in the State display?
+1 for removing that. I think the only reason for them to be there in
the first place was to decrease the chance of matching up against a
real query - but that's not going to happen if they are in a separate
field...
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-11-04 09:15:42 | Re: DeArchiver process |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-11-04 05:26:48 | Re: Further plans to refactor xlog.c |