Re: 9.6 -> 10.0

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:

> On 03/22/2016 09:10 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > While having parallelism is awesome, it's only going to affect a
> > (arguably small or big depending on your viewpoint) subset of users.
> > It's going to be massive for those users, but it's not going to be
> > useful for anywhere near as many users as streaming replication+hot
> > standby+pg_upgrade in 9.0, or pitr+windows in 8.0. And yes, the vacuum
> > freeze thing is also going to be great - for a small subset of users
> > (yes, those users are in a lot of pain now).
> >
> >
> > I had a discussion with Marko T just a couple of weeks back, and the
> > conclusion then was that at the time, 9.6 had almost nothing that would
> > even make the cut for a press release. We now have these two features,
> > which are great features, but I'm not sure it's enough for such a big
> > symbolical bump.
>
> Wait, pglogical didn't make it?
>

"returned with feedback".
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/search/?searchterm=pglogical

Pay attention man :P

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/