| From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-03-22 16:45:02 |
| Message-ID: | 16c89f6c65dcfe4b277c7befe3ed19d3@biglumber.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
> I had a discussion with Marko T just a couple of weeks back, and the
> conclusion then was that at the time, 9.6 had almost nothing that would
> even make the cut for a press release. We now have these two features,
> which are great features, but I'm not sure it's enough for such a big
> symbolical bump.
Postgres 10: we finally fixed our stupid name!
:)
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201603221244
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAlbxdm0ACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjOEwCgggx+w2A5N5sy3P+2EnLyP559
e00An0VWQH9UpxvWd41ttGJx/e1DXzUV
=nWtM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-03-22 16:51:34 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2016-03-22 16:18:02 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |