Re: What's with all the fflush(stderr) calls in pg_standby.c?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What's with all the fflush(stderr) calls in pg_standby.c?
Date: 2017-09-25 01:01:35
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTqdy_dsWJ=oU=BTyv_Wfpo5STapS4Kv701wj94eAHEDw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On a related note, the idea of removing pg_standby altogether has been
> proposed a few times. Apparently there are a few things that it still
> does better than standby_mode, but nobody seems in a hurry to do
> anything about that. Still, I'd be against spending a lot of time
> trying to improve a tool that has mostly outlived its usefulness - we
> ought to be trying to enhance the in-core facilities instead.

+1.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-09-25 03:10:50 Re: Shaky coding for vacuuming partitioned relations
Previous Message Nathan Wagner 2017-09-25 00:52:43 Re: Fix number skipping in to_number