Re: What's with all the fflush(stderr) calls in pg_standby.c?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What's with all the fflush(stderr) calls in pg_standby.c?
Date: 2017-09-25 00:45:09
Message-ID: CA+TgmobuTx+Ck9orX_Yen=Z764Zmsv7cSCVi6OMoMR7myoQLGA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> This looks like cargo-cult programming to me. stderr is almost
> always line-buffered, making these fflush'es pointless. If it's
> not line-buffered, that's probably because it's going to a
> noninteractive destination for which this wouldn't matter.
> Moreover, none of our other programs do this.

On a related note, the idea of removing pg_standby altogether has been
proposed a few times. Apparently there are a few things that it still
does better than standby_mode, but nobody seems in a hurry to do
anything about that. Still, I'd be against spending a lot of time
trying to improve a tool that has mostly outlived its usefulness - we
ought to be trying to enhance the in-core facilities instead.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Wagner 2017-09-25 00:52:43 Re: Fix number skipping in to_number
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2017-09-25 00:42:25 Re: BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?