| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions |
| Date: | 2016-03-29 01:31:23 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRxkDGq0w4U+GoyysJbmrb2nVCexg1DB9Q-JzEV=ZpxWQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
>> v40 is yet another rebase.
>
> Thanks. Committed after removing an unnecessary parameter from the
> coerceToXXX() functions.
>
> I guess the question here is whether we want the part-c patch, which
> removes the historical \setrandom syntax. That's technically no
> longer needed since we now can use random() as a function directly
> inside \set commands, but we might want it anyway for backward
> compatibility.
>
> Anybody have an opinion on that?
+1 for nuking it. That's not worth the trouble maintaining it.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2016-03-29 01:36:15 | Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-03-29 01:17:20 | Re: VS 2015 support in src/tools/msvc |