Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions
Date: 2016-03-29 00:54:00
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYQAANGAm27JYHSaHgTJqdS-nRwmGkqX4XykwH3uGtKWg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
> v40 is yet another rebase.

Thanks. Committed after removing an unnecessary parameter from the
coerceToXXX() functions.

I guess the question here is whether we want the part-c patch, which
removes the historical \setrandom syntax. That's technically no
longer needed since we now can use random() as a function directly
inside \set commands, but we might want it anyway for backward
compatibility.

Anybody have an opinion on that?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-03-29 00:57:45 Re: Typo in comment
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-03-29 00:52:39 pgsql: pgbench: Support double constants and functions.