From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed(dot)90(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Parallel Index Scans |
Date: | 2017-02-15 18:57:29 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob1RoMzXmDRaaka9FsTrBNiLDn4-BFvKQgraPh7ypup5A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:>
>> support related patch. In anycase, to avoid confusion I am attaching
>> all the three patches with this e-mail.
>
> Committed guc_parallel_index_scan_v1.patch, with changes to the
> documentation and GUC descriptions.
And committed parallel_index_opt_exec_support_v10.patch as well, with
a couple of minor tweaks.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-02-15 19:03:46 | Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-02-15 18:39:43 | Re: Parallel Index Scans |