Re: Parallel Index Scans

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed(dot)90(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Parallel Index Scans
Date: 2017-02-15 18:39:43
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYZBh8DX9HC8hfwtqL9=gaBXUizymVjtnVVOanzsgbYrw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:>
> support related patch. In anycase, to avoid confusion I am attaching
> all the three patches with this e-mail.

Committed guc_parallel_index_scan_v1.patch, with changes to the
documentation and GUC descriptions.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-02-15 18:57:29 Re: Parallel Index Scans
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-02-15 18:10:48 Re: Does having a NULL column automatically exclude the table from the tupleDesc cache?