Re: Moving SS_finalize_plan processing to the end of planning

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Moving SS_finalize_plan processing to the end of planning
Date: 2015-09-11 15:02:29
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZNj_xeBPofH+GKvn_km3hTe+XfO-kHdwThiehniBU-HQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>> Do you expect to do more work on the upper planner path-ification stuff soon?
>
>>> Yeah, I do actually have some work in progress. Not sure how soon I'll be
>>> ready to show it --- there's a lot of code to break and reassemble :-(
>
>> Yeah, I remember looking at it a bit and finding it quite an
>> intimidating piece of code. I'm just asking because it would be nice
>> if we got the infrastructure into this release in time to do something
>> with it - specifically, I'd like to find a way for FDWs to push down
>> aggregates, a capability for which EDB has had multiple customer
>> requests (and I'm sure we're not the only ones).
>
> Yeah, I'm well aware that this is blocking progress in several areas.
> I do intend to make it happen, but it's not the only demand on my time.

Sure, I understand that.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2015-09-11 15:13:29 Re: Double linking MemoryContext children
Previous Message Joe Conway 2015-09-11 14:51:06 Re: RLS open items are vague and unactionable