Re: Moving SS_finalize_plan processing to the end of planning

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Moving SS_finalize_plan processing to the end of planning
Date: 2015-09-11 13:14:29
Message-ID: 422.1441977269@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> Do you expect to do more work on the upper planner path-ification stuff soon?

>> Yeah, I do actually have some work in progress. Not sure how soon I'll be
>> ready to show it --- there's a lot of code to break and reassemble :-(

> Yeah, I remember looking at it a bit and finding it quite an
> intimidating piece of code. I'm just asking because it would be nice
> if we got the infrastructure into this release in time to do something
> with it - specifically, I'd like to find a way for FDWs to push down
> aggregates, a capability for which EDB has had multiple customer
> requests (and I'm sure we're not the only ones).

Yeah, I'm well aware that this is blocking progress in several areas.
I do intend to make it happen, but it's not the only demand on my time.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2015-09-11 13:22:56 Re: WIP: Rework access method interface
Previous Message Anastasia Lubennikova 2015-09-11 12:45:04 [PROPOSAL] Covering + unique indexes.