Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
To: Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA <leandro(at)dutra(dot)fastmail(dot)fm>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Date: 2006-01-18 13:56:14
Message-ID: C17C695B-BEDB-4BA8-843C-9A1EF7AAF00C@myrealbox.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Jan 18, 2006, at 22:08 , Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA wrote:

> Jim C. Nasby <jnasby <at> pervasive.com> writes:
>
>> a) the optimizer does a really poor job on multi-column index
>> statistics
>
> So it should be fixed?

Of course! Patches welcome!

Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-01-18 13:58:46 Unique constraints for non-btree indexes
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-01-18 13:42:08 Re: enums