Re: enums

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA <leandro(at)dutra(dot)fastmail(dot)fm>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: enums
Date: 2006-01-18 13:42:08
Message-ID: 43CE45B0.3030501@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA wrote:

>Andrew Dunstan <andrew <at> dunslane.net> writes:
>
>
>
>>If people would like to play, I have created a little kit to help in
>>creating first class enum types in a few seconds.
>>
>>
>
>Isn't what we actually want possreps?
>
>
>
>
>

You appear to be responding to mail from months ago. Please catch up
before replying, so we don't rehash old discussions. As previously
discussed, I intend to do first class enums for the next release of
postgres, if I get enough time. Enumkit was just a very small step along
the research road, although it is useful in itself, which is why I
released it.

cheers

andrew

In response to

  • Re: enums at 2006-01-18 13:24:36 from Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Glaesemann 2006-01-18 13:56:14 Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-01-18 13:32:46 Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)