Re: what can be wrong? backport plpgpsm to 8.1

From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: what can be wrong? backport plpgpsm to 8.1
Date: 2007-03-10 21:38:01
Message-ID: BAY20-F1982E446AFFC2C1D19498BF97F0@phx.gbl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
>Specifically I think you need to study this patch:
>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-01/msg00370.php
>
>But isn't back-porting plpgpsm to old releases a waste of development
>and maintenance effort anyway?
>

I unlike it and last weak I play with it. But I don't expect so Debian and
RH will be support 8.3 soon. And I would to help to expansion plpgpsm. When
I comment FreeExecutorState, runtime works well (with some minor problems -
domains). With 8.1 support I will have much bigger group of users, testers
(I hope).

I have to study your patch.

Thank you
Pavel Stehule

_________________________________________________________________
Najdete si svou lasku a nove pratele na Match.com. http://www.msn.cz/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-03-10 22:10:51 Re: [PATCHES] scan_recycle_buffers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-03-10 21:06:16 Re: what can be wrong? backport plpgpsm to 8.1