Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry
Date: 2011-05-20 17:47:18
Message-ID: BANLkTimJM2GTMSCwksJAavSDCP9m4aCnQw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

2011/5/20 Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 1:38 pm, Dave Page wrote:
>
>>>
>>> We need something. I need to be able to push buildfarm client tarballs
>>> too, so Tom's not the only person who needs this.
>>
>> No, I don't expect he is. Like his work though, in my mind the
>> buildfarm is a "family" project that we could accomodate in other
>> ways.
>>
>
> Sure, I just wanted to make sure this is on the table up front.

The problem here, is how we'd define a "family" project of course.
We'd need to keep the numbers low to be manageable. The benefits I
imagine would be:

- Ability to upload files to the FTP site via ssh.
- @postgresql.org mailing lists.
- Use of git.postgresql.org for the primary repo.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2011-05-20 18:04:28 Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-05-20 17:46:50 Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry