Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: "Stefan Kaltenbrunner" <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL WWW" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry
Date: 2011-05-20 17:46:50
Message-ID: 11409.192.75.139.253.1305913610.squirrel@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Fri, May 20, 2011 1:38 pm, Dave Page wrote:

>>
>> We need something. I need to be able to push buildfarm client tarballs
>> too, so Tom's not the only person who needs this.
>
> No, I don't expect he is. Like his work though, in my mind the
> buildfarm is a "family" project that we could accomodate in other
> ways.
>

Sure, I just wanted to make sure this is on the table up front.

>> Even more importantly, the mailings lists on pgfoundry are a critical
>> piece of the buildfarm infrastructure - that's how status notifications
>> get out to people like Tom. We also need lists for commit notifications
>> and members discussion.
>
> Any reason we couldn't use the main list server for that?

Would work for me.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2011-05-20 17:47:18 Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry
Previous Message Dave Page 2011-05-20 17:38:20 Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry