Re: Backup very large databases

From: Steve Lane <slane(at)fmpro(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Backup very large databases
Date: 2002-04-20 13:56:43
Message-ID: B8E6DDCB.C23C%slane@fmpro.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 4/19/02 10:24 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> writes:
>> On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Francisco Reyes wrote:
>>> I have about 7GB worth of data.
>
>> I anticipate having a 30-50 GB or larger database in the next few months.
>
> FWIW, there are people out there with multi-hundred-GB to TB databases
> (you might try searching the archives for "American Chemical Society",
> for instance). So you're not pioneers.
>
> I do agree that the special problems of running huge DBs on Postgres
> might belong in a pgsql-perform list rather than any of the regular
> lists. Anyone else agree? Or does the pgsql-general list readership
> want to see this stuff?

I'd like to see it. It seems to me all of those discussions could have at
least some implication for the "low end".

-- sgl

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Francisco Reyes 2002-04-20 14:08:15 Re: Backup very large databases
Previous Message Roderick A. Anderson 2002-04-20 13:37:09 Re: Backup very large databases