| From: | Francisco Reyes <lists(at)natserv(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, Nikolay Mihaylov <pg(at)nmmm(dot)nu>, pgsql General List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Backup very large databases |
| Date: | 2002-04-20 14:08:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20020420100625.H6740-100000@zoraida.natserv.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> I do agree that the special problems of running huge DBs on Postgres
> might belong in a pgsql-perform list rather than any of the regular
> lists. Anyone else agree? Or does the pgsql-general list readership
> want to see this stuff?
I think the better question is.. do people who has a special situation due
to their DB size want to go through all of the GENERAL mails.
Even though my DB is only about 7GB I would like to see a "performance"
list.
What would be it's charter?
A list dedicated for Large and 24 x 7 PostgreSQL installations?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Francisco Reyes | 2002-04-20 14:10:44 | Re: Backup very large databases |
| Previous Message | Steve Lane | 2002-04-20 13:56:43 | Re: Backup very large databases |