| From: | "Hell, Robert" <Robert(dot)Hell(at)fabasoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] GUC parameter cursors_tuple_fraction |
| Date: | 2008-05-02 20:41:07 |
| Message-ID: | B710F3299F04664DB6B37C258FDEEB94017D4829@FABAMAIL.fabagl.fabasoft.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
You're right - that's just a typo in the subject of the post.
It's called cursor_tuple_fraction in the submitted patch.
Regards,
Robert
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Freitag, 02. Mai 2008 22:36
To: Simon Riggs
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas; Hell, Robert; pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org;
pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] GUC parameter cursors_tuple_fraction
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> OK, if that's the view then the patch is ready for commit, AFAICS.
Use of the plural in the name seems a bit odd to me. Anyone have a
problem with calling it "cursor_tuple_fraction" instead?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2008-05-02 20:47:12 | Re: Protection from SQL injection |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-02 20:36:04 | Re: [HACKERS] GUC parameter cursors_tuple_fraction |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-05-02 20:49:39 | Re: [HACKERS] GUC parameter cursors_tuple_fraction |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-02 20:36:04 | Re: [HACKERS] GUC parameter cursors_tuple_fraction |