Re: [HACKERS] GUC parameter cursors_tuple_fraction

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Hell, Robert" <Robert(dot)Hell(at)fabasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GUC parameter cursors_tuple_fraction
Date: 2008-05-02 20:36:04
Message-ID: 21779.1209760564@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> OK, if that's the view then the patch is ready for commit, AFAICS.

Use of the plural in the name seems a bit odd to me. Anyone have a
problem with calling it "cursor_tuple_fraction" instead?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hell, Robert 2008-05-02 20:41:07 Re: [HACKERS] GUC parameter cursors_tuple_fraction
Previous Message Chris Browne 2008-05-02 19:58:01 Re: Protection from SQL injection

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hell, Robert 2008-05-02 20:41:07 Re: [HACKERS] GUC parameter cursors_tuple_fraction
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-05-02 19:57:28 Re: configure option for XLOG_BLCKSZ