Re: Contrib, schema, and load_module

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Contrib, schema, and load_module
Date: 2008-10-11 12:12:20
Message-ID: ACD7FD02-2B19-45BD-8FF8-D321F124C6BD@hi-media.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Le 11 oct. 08 à 01:50, Tom Lane a écrit :
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> It seems that the real way forward is to improve on that patch.
>
> Yeah. If the schema-per-module answer were really a good answer,
> we'd have done it before now.

I tried to spend some time thinking about those issues and came up
with a packaging management proposal, which I still think has merits.
One of them is to propose to reuse existing stuff and Tom Dunstan's
preliminary work.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-07/msg01098.php

Hope this helps,
- --
dim

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkjwmCQACgkQlBXRlnbh1bmIggCdGqD8TwJE7CeZDCL+v5njPtib
4+kAoLVj3rDzsFpJvb/Zc20R+Jo/s5Z7
=O6C6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2008-10-11 12:12:25 Re: The Axe list
Previous Message Robert Haas 2008-10-11 12:10:27 Re: patch: array_ndims