Re: The Axe list

From: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The Axe list
Date: 2008-10-11 12:12:25
Message-ID: 603c8f070810110512q36014ff7l825d09efce593fe0@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>> CREATE AGGREGATE array_accum (anyelement)
>>
>> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION array_enum(anyarray)
>
> Have you actually tried these functions on large data sets?

No. :-)

> They're not in the same performance league as intagg. Your array_accum is O(n^2)!

It's not "mine" - I copied it from the official PostgreSQL
documentation and used it because it did what I needed!

If it's a bad way to do it, that's certainly an argument for keeping
(or maybe generalizing) intagg.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2008-10-11 12:49:57 Re: The Axe list
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2008-10-11 12:12:20 Re: Contrib, schema, and load_module