Re: recovery getting interrupted is not so unusual as it used to be

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: recovery getting interrupted is not so unusual as it used to be
Date: 2010-05-13 03:07:06
Message-ID: AANLkTimvKL_Q_mEr8FoOqGOIUkpBh9-Sz9bSyqPcVaKs@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> When firing up a properly shut down HS slave, I get:
>
> LOG:  database system was interrupted while in recovery at log time
> 2010-05-12 20:35:24 EDT
> HINT:  If this has occurred more than once some data might be
> corrupted and you might need to choose an earlier recovery target.
>
> But this is kind of an alarming hint for what is now a normal and
> expected condition.  Can we detect the difference between the case
> where the HINT is really accurate and the case where it's not in some
> way, and display a better message?

How about my previous proposal: adding new system status like
DB_SHUTDOWNED_IN_RECOVERY, setting the status to it when the shutdown
is performed during recovery, and reporting the suitable message
when starting up the server from it?
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-02/msg00337.php

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-05-13 03:07:29 Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-05-13 02:56:28 Re: comment needs to be updated for HS?